Philosophy & The Crown
Philosophy Now|February/March 2024
Vincent Di Norcia on monarchy and stability.
Vincent Di Norcia
Philosophy & The Crown

Machiavelli is a political philosopher with a sulfer-ous reputation. His comment above, though, reflected his bitter personal experience of war-ring Italian city states. He wrote The Prince after his decades of dedicated and skillful public service to the Flo-rentine Republic had been rewarded with torture and exile. Perhaps his implicit approval of the relatively stable hereditary monarchies was not surprising. Nor was René Descartes' sup-port for monarchy, for, as he wrote, his “whole aim was to find security”, and he “prized tranquility over everything” (Discourse p.28; p.54). So he saw support for the legitimate authority of his King as a moral choice. His ‘first moral maxim’ echoed Michel de Montaigne’s support for Henry II in back 1574, when civil war had broken out in France after the 1572 St Bartholomew’s Day massacre of Huguenots by Catholics. While Montaigne complained that “the moral laws concern-ing the duty of each man in himself are hard to frame”, he com-bined private duty with public reason, including submission to public authority, to write: “It is in justice that kingly virtue mainly consists” (Essays, 1580, p.336). Descartes, who knew Montaigne’s Essays, was certainly influenced by the views of his great predecessor.

この記事は Philosophy Now の February/March 2024 版に掲載されています。

7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、9,000 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。

この記事は Philosophy Now の February/March 2024 版に掲載されています。

7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、9,000 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。

PHILOSOPHY NOWのその他の記事すべて表示